Can dental implants fail?
Yes. An implant can fail to integrate or develop problems later. An implant that stays in can still have complications such as gum inflammation, bone loss or a broken part. Published survival rates describe study groups, not your own outcome.
See the sources ↓Survival is not the same as success.
Still in place.
A survival measure counts whether the implant remains. It does not automatically account for every repair or tissue problem.
The bigger picture.
Comfort, appearance, cleaning, gum health, and restoration maintenance matter too. Ask how a quoted success rate is defined.
Why can two studies report different numbers?
Patient selection, follow-up length, missing participants, restoration types, and definitions affect the results. A headline percentage is not a personal forecast.
Benefits, limitations, and realistic outcomes
Most implants stay in place for many years, but they can fail, and an implant that stays in can still have problems: gum inflammation, bone loss around it, or a loose or broken part. Knowing which risks apply to you, and what lowers them, is more useful than a single success figure. If you're still learning the basics, start with what dental implants are.
Below: what the survival figures measure, the complications that come up early and late, the factors that raise risk, and what's done when something goes wrong.
How successful are dental implants?
In systematic reviews, about 94 to 96 percent of implants were still in place at ten years (Moraschini 2015; Howe 2019). That's survival: the implant remains. It isn't the same as no complications, and it can't predict your own outcome.
Success is a stricter test. Criteria proposed by Albrektsson and colleagues, and used in later research, look for things like:
- Comfort, with no persistent pain
- A stable implant and restoration
- No infection or significant bone loss around the implant
- An acceptable appearance
- Long-term retention without the need for removal
Reported rates differ with the study, the patients included and how long they were followed. Even so, with appropriate patient selection and clinical protocols, implants are widely regarded as a predictable and durable treatment.
Common risks and complications
The risks fall into three groups: surgical, biological (the gum and bone) and mechanical (the parts).
Early complications, during or shortly after surgery, can include:
- Infection at the surgical site
- Slow or poor healing
- The implant not integrating with the bone (integration failure)
- Nerve irritation or temporary numbness
- Sinus problems, for upper implants near the sinus
Later complications, once the implant has been in for a while, can include:
- Peri-implant mucositis: inflammation of the gum around the implant
- Peri-implantitis: inflammation with loss of the bone around the implant
- Mechanical problems such as a loose abutment or a cracked crown
- Gradual bone loss around the implant
In long-term epidemiological reviews, peri-implant mucositis is common, while peri-implantitis affects a smaller but meaningful share of patients. Regular check-ups catch these early, when they're easier to treat. The healing and recovery timeline covers what's normal in the weeks after placement.
Factors that can increase risk
These are the factors dentists look for when planning:
- Poor oral hygiene. Plaque left around implants leads to inflammation and peri-implant disease.
- Uncontrolled medical conditions. Uncontrolled diabetes or autoimmune disorders can impair healing and affect long-term stability.
- Smoking. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, smokers had higher implant failure rates than non-smokers, reflecting tobacco's effects on blood flow and healing.
- Teeth grinding (bruxism). Heavy, uncontrolled grinding overloads implants and restorations, raising the risk of mechanical failure.
- Insufficient bone quality or quantity. Too little bone makes it harder for the implant to be stable at placement and to integrate.
None of these automatically rules you out. They may add steps to the plan, such as gum treatment, grafting or a night guard. The guide on who is a good candidate for dental implants explains each one.
The role of planning and diagnostics
Good planning reduces some risks; it can't remove them. The assessment usually includes:
- Bone density, volume and shape at the site
- Gum health and the condition of the soft tissue
- Your bite and how your teeth meet
- Your medical history and current medications
- Imaging, including a CBCT scan by referral when it's clinically indicated
The scan itself is quick. The imaging facility or a radiologist then prepares the images and sends them to your dentist, which can take some time. Our sister site explains what a CBCT scan shows and why it's used for implant planning.
Seeing the anatomy in advance lets the dentist spot problems, such as a nerve close to the site or thin bone, before surgery rather than during it.
Maintenance and long-term care
Implants need looking after. The Canadian Dental Association recommends regular brushing, flossing and dental check-ups, the same as for natural teeth.
Long-term care includes:
- Regular professional cleanings and examination of the implant
- Daily brushing and cleaning between teeth and around implants
- Periodic imaging to check the bone and gum around the implant
- Telling your dentist promptly about any change, discomfort or unusual symptom
People who keep up with check-ups and cleaning are more likely to do well with their implants over the long term.
When complications occur
A complication isn't the same as a failed implant. Many problems caught early can be handled with simpler measures:
- Professional cleaning and debridement around the implant
- Adjusting the restoration or the bite
- Treating local inflammation or infection
- Tightening or replacing loose or worn parts
Some problems need more involved treatment. Occasionally an implant has to be removed, and replacing it needs a fresh assessment.
Why individual assessment matters
Population figures give context. Your own risk depends on your gums, bone, medical history and habits, and on the restoration planned. For the bigger question of value, read whether dental implants are worth it.
Ask the dentist assessing you which of these risks apply to you, and how they'd monitor for them.
Questions about your own situation?
Ask how your health and proposed restoration affect your own risks and maintenance needs.
ImplantOptions.ca is published by Smile Studio Dental, a dental office in Markham. If you'd like to talk through what you've read with a dentist, you can request a consultation. You're also welcome to bring these questions to your own dentist.
References
- Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11-25.
- Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza ES. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(3):377-388.
- Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: a systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019;84:9-21.
- Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease: a systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(Suppl 16):S158-S171.
- Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S246-S266.
- Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Smoking and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(5):487-498.
- Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):55-77.
- Canadian Dental Association: dental implants
A useful next question.
“What are my individual risks, and how will you monitor them?”
See my consultation questions ↗